Isolated abdominal circumference vs. estimated fetal weight, which matters more?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. In 2020, the Society Maternal Medicine American College Obstetricians Gynecologists redefined fetal from estimated weight (EFW) less than 10th percentile to EFW or abdominal circumference (AC) percentile. our study, we seek assess rate abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in fetuses with FGR diagnosed by isolated AC versus those This retrospective case control study included all singleton non anomalous pregnancies between October 2019 December 2021. Patients were divided based on criteria at time initial diagnosis FGR. The group (iAC group) patients due greater. (EFW regardless primary outcome velocimetry; defined as pulsatility index greater 95th percentile, absent reversed end-diastolic velocity. During timeframe 733 There 248 iAC 485 group. had 10.5% (26/248) compared 19.8% (96/485) (p < 0.001). number needed treat (NNT) for antenatal testing detect 1 doppler 10.3.The average gestational age was 33.6 weeks 31.3 0.001) first Further studies this new subset are needed.
منابع مشابه
Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic value of sonographic measurement of fetal abdominal circumference (AC) for the prediction of fetal macrosomia. MATERIAL AND METHOD A prospective clinical trial was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. The study consisted of 361 singleton pregnant women who were admitted for deliv...
متن کاملa new formula for estimated fetal weight: the impression of biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight
background: abdominal circumference (ac), biparietal diameters (bpd) and femoral length (fl) are now the main parameters used to obtain estimated fetal weight (efw). although the role of soft tissue parameters in determining fetal weight was proved but clinical attention to mid-thigh soft tissue thickness (stt) is limited. objective: to find the impression of stt on birth weight (bw) and repres...
متن کاملUnconditional and conditional standards for fetal abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight in an ethnic Chinese population: a birth cohort study
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of intrauterine fetal growth restriction and prediction of small-for-gestation age are often based on fetal abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight (EFW). The present study aims to create unconditional (cross-sectional) and conditional (longitudinal) standards of fetal abdominal circumference and EFW for use in an ethnic Chinese population. METHODS In the Growin...
متن کاملUltrasonographic normogram of fetal kidney circumference and fetal abdominal circumference ratio for early prenatal diagnosis.
Serial ultrasound scans were done in 300 fetuses between 16 to 24 weeks of gestation to establish the normogram of fetal kidney circumference (FKC) and fetal abdominal circumference (FAC) ratio (FKC/FAC). Of 300 fetuses, 150 fetuses were in the high risk group for fetal malformation and 150 patients were in the control group. The value of FKC/FAC varied from 0.27 to 0.30 from 16 to 24 weeks of ...
متن کاملSerial fetal abdominal circumference measurements in predicting normal birth weight in gestational diabetes mellitus.
OBJECTIVES To construct a clinical management matrix using serial fetal abdominal circumference measurements (ACMs) that will predict normal birth weight in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes (GDM) and reduce unnecessary ultrasound examination in women with GDM. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of 144 women with GDM in a specialist obstetric-diabetes clinic. Women with GDM...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['1097-6868', '0002-9378', '1085-8709']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1081